Disabled activists who persuaded the United Nation

first_imgDisabled activists who persuaded the United Nations (UN) to investigate serious breaches of rights by the UK government say their four-year journey has been vindicated, after a report concluded there had been “grave or systematic violations” of the UN’s disability convention.Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) – led by its co-founder Debbie Jolly – first approached the UN’s committee on the rights of persons with disabilities (CRPD) four years ago, and lodged a formal request to investigate the allegations the following year. Now, more than four years after the first contact from DPAC, CRPD has published its report into the allegations.The committee has concluded that the UK government is guilty of “grave or systematic violations” of disabled people’s human rights, and that it has discriminated against them across three key parts of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD).DPAC welcomed the report – the first such high-level inquiry to be carried out by CRPD – but was scathing about the government’s response, which rejected the committee’s conclusions and all 11 of its recommendations.Within 48 hours, DPAC had published a detailed rebuttal of the government’s claims.Linda Burnip, co-founder of DPAC, said: “The DPAC research team, led by Debbie Jolly, are delighted that our allegations of the grave and systematic violations of disabled people’s human rights have been fully vindicated by the UN inquiry into the UK, which highlighted a catalogue of abuses heaped on disabled people by the UK government since 2010.“However, as expected, the Tories’ response to this report is a disgrace, although even their own responses to the UN show them up as compulsive liars, idiots, or both.”DPAC and other disabled activists, including Black Triangle co-founder John McArdle, were also furious that the government leaked the UN report to a right-wing tabloid, The Mail on Sunday, and attempted to rubbish its conclusions before it was published the following day.A string of leading campaigners have signed a letter written by McArdle that will be sent to the UN to ask it to condemn the UK government’s “unacceptable” behaviour, which they say was an attempt to “discredit and delegitimise the report”.The committee examined breaches under articles 19 (independent living), article 27 (work and employment) and article 28 (adequate standard of living and social protection) of the convention.Under article 19, the report concludes that the government’s social security reforms – including cuts to housing benefits, the introduction of the benefits cap, changes in eligibility criteria for personal independence payment, the tightening of eligibility criteria for social care, and the closure of the Independent Living Fund – have “disproportionately affected persons with disabilities and hindered various aspects of their right to live independently and be included in the community”.On article 27, it says that evidence it has collected “points to significant hardship, including financial, material and psychological”, experienced by disabled people undergoing benefits assessments.And it points to a significant and “disproportionate” increase in benefit sanctions handed to claimants in the employment and support allowance (ESA) work-related activity group between 2012 and 2014.It concludes that “claimants who have been sanctioned have faced financial hardship, including through becoming indebted, relying on the support of relatives or on food banks or having reduced essential services”.Under article 28, the committee says it was given evidence that showed social security reforms “had a more negative impact” on households including disabled people, “especially on those living on low income”.As part of its inquiry, two CRPD members spent two weeks in the UK in October 2015, interviewing more than 200 people, including civil servants, politicians, academics, researchers, lawyers and representatives of disabled people’s organisations, as well as collecting more then 3,000 pages of documentary evidence.The report concludes that disabled people “have had their freedom of choice and control over their daily activities restricted, the extra cost of disability has been set aside and income protection has been curtailed as a result of benefit cuts”.Among its 11 recommendations – all of which were rejected by the UK government – the report calls for more funding for disabled people affected by austerity measures since 2010, for measures to ensure “appropriate legal advice” is available to disabled people, and for the government to do more to “actively consult and engage” with disabled people and “give due consideration to their views”.It also repeats the call made many times by disabled campaigners since 2011 for the government to carry out an assessment of the cumulative impact of all of its cuts and reforms on disabled people.Pat Onions, co-founder of Pat’s Petition, said: “Over five years ago, Pat’s Petition launched a campaign asking for a cumulative impact assessment (CIA) of how the cuts the government were going to implement, under the new welfare reform bill, would affect chronically sick and disabled people and their carers.“This was successful in bringing together grassroots groups, politicians and people from all walks of life.”The petition, and later one by the WOWcampaign, led to a debate in parliament.Onions said: “Had the government carried out a CIA, how many deaths would have been prevented? How much suffering prevented?“Instead they snubbed us, laughed at us and called us names. Now the UN is calling for exactly the same – a CIA. And the government is ridiculing them too.”The government says in its response to the report that it “strongly disagrees” with its conclusions and “does not accept the report’s conclusion that there is evidence of grave and systematic violation of the rights of disabled people”.It says: “The report focuses on too narrow a scope and, in doing so, presents an inaccurate picture of life for disabled people in the UK.“The government reiterates its position that the reforms discussed in the report were right, ensuring a sustainable system that continues to protect people who are more vulnerable while supporting those who can work to do so.“The report’s narrow focus on employment and support allowance (ESA) processes with little consideration of employment programmes does not adequately reflect the support available for disabled people to work in the UK.”It adds: “The government stands by its reform of the UK welfare system, which is designed to provide adequate standards of living, a comprehensive support system and special protections for vulnerable people.”Asked to confirm that it did not accept any of the committee’s 11 recommendations, a DWP spokeswoman declined to do so, instead claiming that the “core intention of these recommendations are already incorporated into UK policies and practices”.A spokeswoman for the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said that “dialogue on the issues raised [does] not end with the publication of the findings”, and that CRPD “looks forward to continued engagement with the UK on the human rights of persons with disabilities”.Asked for the committee’s response to the UK government’s apparent refusal to accept any of its recommendations, Maria Soledad Cisternas Reyes, CRPD’s chair, told Disability News Service: “We maintain a continuous dialogue with the UK government ‎and stand ready to meet and discuss the substantive elements of the report, taking into account the best way of implementation with regards to persons with disabilities.“We know responses to policy measures evolve and therefore welcome any positive measures the government has taken or will undertake to ensure that the rights of persons with disabilities are met in full compliance with the convention to which the UK is a state party.”She added: “We believe that this report and the UK government’s response will generate an open, informed and inclusive debate across the [UK], with the full participation of persons with disabilities and the organisations that represent them.”The committee will now meet to discuss the government’s comments and determine its response in Geneva in March.CRPD also announced that the UK will be examined for the first time on its overall progress in implementing the convention in August and September 2017, “when the findings of the inquiry will also be raised to assess progress made in relation to the recommendations”.Linda Burnip, from DPAC, said the UN investigation only took place because of the actions of grassroots disabled activists.She said: “While the large disability charities and organisations such as Amnesty with huge financial and staff resources sat back and did nothing to challenge the government, DPAC as usual raised the issues and will keep raising them both visibly and through research and evidence-gathering.“This report is just the beginning, but will be an invaluable tool [with] which to continue our campaigning.”last_img read more

The Conservatives have refused to comment on an ap

first_imgThe Conservatives have refused to comment on an apparently misleading public pledge by the minister for disabled people that another Tory government would “dismantle” the work capability assessment.Penny Mordaunt was speaking at a disability hustings event in Westminster that was organised by the Disability Charities Consortium, the Disability Benefits Consortium and the Care and Support Alliance.Asked by a representative of the sight loss charity Thomas Pocklington Trust how to reform the benefits system so that it no longer required disabled people to “pay for their benefits with their dignity”, she said a Conservative government would “legislate to reform the work capability assessment” which “treats people like they are part of a sausage factory”.She then added: “We have managed to get into the manifesto a legislative commitment to dismantle the work capability assessment.”But there is no mention of the WCA in the party’s general election manifesto, or of “dismantling” it, and it pledges only that the Tories will continue targeting benefits “at those who need it most”, and to provide claimants of out-of-work disability benefits with “personalised and tailored employment support”.And last October’s work, health and disability green paper included no pledge to “dismantle” or scrap the assessment process but only to try to improve it, and suggested the WCA might in the future be used only to decide entitlement to financial support, with a separate process allocating employment support.Mordaunt (pictured, right) was the only one of the three party representatives – she was joined by Labour’s Kate Green (centre) and the Liberal Democrats’ disabled president Baroness [Sal] Brinton (left) – who refused afterwards to be interviewed by Disability News Service (see separate stories).A Conservative party official who accompanied Mordaunt to Tuesday’s event promised that she would answer questions instead by email, but she had failed to respond to any of those questions by noon today (Thursday).Both Labour and the Liberal Democrats promise in their manifestos to scrap the WCA.Another audience member, from the mental health charity Rethink, said she had found the WCA process “awful” and “distressing” and that it had “made my [mental] illness much, much worse”, as had the assessment process for the other main disability benefit, personal independence payment (PIP).Mordaunt said the government needed to involve professionals with expertise in particular health conditions in assessing claimants, while DWP needed to “look at working much more closely with healthcare”.She had earlier admitted that there was “no group in society that is so discriminated against [as disabled people], whether it be the barriers of the environment, of attitudes, or the failings of the state”.And she said a Conservative government needed to ensure that new homes that are built in both the private and social sectors are accessible.She added: “We need greater accessibility to buildings, facilities, and we need real equality of experience.”She said this would mean a review of regulations for licensing, building, planning and parking, and “regulators and also new ombudsmen” to protect the rights of disabled people.last_img read more

KEIRON Cunningham felt the scoreline didnt reflec

first_imgKEIRON Cunningham felt the scoreline didn’t reflect the overall performance in Friday night’s World Club Series clash with Sydney.Saints went down 38-12 to the Roosters in Game One of the series.“I thought we started good,” he said. “I was happy with the response from last week for sure.“We got a bit of a tough call on the first try but you have to take the rough with the smooth.“I was proud of my middles though, I thought they were outstanding. The difference in the game were the outside backs. We came up a little short in those areas as theirs were outstanding. They took every opportunity that came their way – but those tries came a little against the run of play.“I thought Jackson Hastings was outstanding and the kid in the centre, if that was his debut then he will be an absolute superstar.“Unfortunately the scoreline got blown out and for me it didn’t justify the game. It was closer than that.”He continued: “I don’t think we fell short in the middle and our boys enjoyed challenging themselves there. But we let ourselves down in certain areas. But we have a lot to work with going forward.“Dominique Peyroux was brilliant for us; he was a shining light amongst those kids. Luke Thompson was great and Andre Savelio was brilliant too. Alex Walmsley took some shots in the week and he stood up.“We had some busted bodies out there tonight, some played with needles and I thought they did a great job for me.“Travis Burns did a good job too. He did it at Penrith so I thought he would do a decent job.“We crammed a lot of info into him and there was smoke coming out of his ears at times!“He gives is a good option going forward.”last_img read more